President Obama's First 100 Days

The whole, "First 100 Days" is a media creation. For me, it makes no sense. How can you possibly hold a newly elected President accountable for fixing every thing wrong within the country in only 100 days? Come on, there is the whole transition issue, and many more concerns.

However, be that as it may, Obama is an example of a President who has come out swinging for "change that we can believe in".

Except it is not at all "change that we can believe in", nor is it change that is good for this nation. Below, are some "changes" that Barrak Obama has instituted for this nation that aren't anything "that we can believe in", as Americans. At least not for Americans who believe in the Founding Fathers' vision for America.

In no particular order, here are the "changes" that Obama has in mind for America:

Administration choices:

Tim Geithner - Secretary of Treasury.

A "tax cheat" who is not only not qualified to run the IRS, but is hell bent on ensuring government intervention in, not only those private corporations that have accepted "bail out" money, but any, and all businesses who "might be on the verge of failure". A clear move to socialism, or better yet fascism! Goodbye, to the sucesses of capitalism and the free market and hello to the era of failed socialist/fascist economy.

Eric Holder - Attorney General.

A racist black man who is accusing white americans of not intermixing with the black populace on weekends. Who, by the way, segregate themselves naturally. What? Because black americans don't want to hang out with white people on weekends, it's somehow the white americans fault? Paleeeze!

Janet Napolitano - Secretary of Home Land Security.

This appointee has decided that Veterans, and any one who wants limited government, is conservative in their political views, and anyone who agrees with The Founding Fathers, is a terrorist threat to this nation. I am flabbergased by her thinking, and a tad bit worried. Are we heading toward a Fascist State?

Rahm Emanuel - Chief Of Staff.

Apart from his tendancy to mail dead fish wrapped in newspaper to his political opponents, he thinks that "there is no crisis that should be allowed to go to waste" because, it can be exploited to take advantage of to further his political aims.
That says all we need to no about this snake.

Foreign Policy:

Obama's "Apologize For America Tour" in Europe:

As President of The United States of America, Obama decided to call us "arrogant" and never once, defended our nation's noble role throughout the world particularly, Europe, in ensuring that those people were free and enjoyed human rights protection. I mean, come on! We all know that had America not intervened in WWII those very European nations that he was cowardly apologizing to would have been either lamp shades or speaking German. Where was his head?

Was Obama rewarded for his anti-American screed? No. In Great Britain, he was insulted from even their most liberal press, by them asking the question as to why a bore like Obama was still in their country".

Obama's representation of America in the "Americas Summit":

As if his performance in Europe wasn't bad enough, here he was embracing Raul Castro in Cuba, erroding America's policy with that pathetic communist country by suggesting that we relax certain foreign policies with them.

He didn't just stop there, he sat through Daniel Ortega's hate filled diatribe against America without registering, not even once, any defense of America's stance against him and his murderous philosophy.

Obama then moves on to Venezuela and allows that murderous thug, Chavez, to run shod all over him with a "photo opportunity" just to hand him an anti-American book, which Obama accepts without comment. Later we see Obama shaking Chavez's hand and yucking it up with him. This is traiterous and disgusting on Obama's part.

Iran:

Lastly, we see Obama cozying up to Iran's crazed, Holocaust denying, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. As if this loser is really going to be able to be "sweet talked to".
What is Obama thinking? What is the left thinking? Does he and his like minded leftists really think they can talk our way out of the potential nuclear threat that a loose cannon like Ahmadinejad poses?

National Security:

Obama, in his infinte wisdom, has decided that the Guantamo Bay prison facility, where we are housing the terrorist captives that pose a very real threat to our security, needs to be shut down. Oh really? What does he propose we do with the vermin that is housed there? Bring them to the U.S. for trials conducted under laws that are meant for legal U.S. citizens? Locate them in prisons here in the U.S.? Set them free in America because they might be mistreated in their own countries? Only a wrong headed liberal could come up with such a disaterous plan.

Obama has decided that there is some sort of urgent need to reveal classified documents to the public, hence the whole world, hence our enemies, providing the details about our interrogation techniques. This is by far, the most dangerous of his foolish moves.

Now al Queida, and other terrorists organizations out there who hate us have all they need to know about what to expect from the U.S. if they are captured. Actually, now that they know what we were doing, and won't do any more. Talk about a recruiting tool for terrorists! Obama has just aided our enemies greatly. Now, they are laughing at us, and are most certainly emboldened more than they were before, under Bush's administration. Now, thanks to Obama, we look more like "the paper tiger" that Osama bin Laden thought we were prior to 9/11.

Of course, Obama is not even handed in all of this. The classifed documents that demonstrate the benefits we recieve from extended interrogation processes like, water boarding, will remain removed from the public view. I think any thinking American can readily recognize the scam in all of this.

Obama has decided, all on his own, that water boarding is somehow "torture" and is above the dignity of our country. Valuable intelligence gained from this practice, (which by the way, never once threatens the participants life at all, but only makes them think it does), and has definatley deliverd valuable intelligence which has kept us safe under Bush's watch will now be sacrificed for Obama's tendancy to want to appear nice to our enemies.

Of course, Obama arrogantly believes that we can achieve the same effect using "other methods", (of which methods he doesn't specify). But, of course, we are all just suppose to go along with this fantasy of his, regardless of the details. Of which there aren't any.

Fear Tactics:

I'm not saying for sure that Obama approved of this, but there is that whole "photo op" with the jet flying really low in New York City with two Air Force fighter jets flying towards it in apparent chase for the "photo op".

WTF? You have genuinely frighened New Yorkers, panicking for their lives, all for a photo op?

What about the thousands of tax payer dollars wasted in fuel for this bone-headed moment. Does Obama really think that the common tax payer is going to tolerate this obscene waste of tax payer money when they themselves are told to tighten their belts and make sacrifices?

What a tool Obama is.

He did mention in his "mock press confrence" last night before the nation his metaphor of the government being like a, what was it? Oh yeah, maybe a cruise liner ship. That is just perfect. Because it brings to mind the arrogantly designed, Titanic. If Obama's ultra-liberal vision for America and the Democrat Party dupes that go along with it are allowed to proceed, America is about to hit the mother of all icebergs, and sink.

I'm not saying that it is going to happen - only that it just MIGHT happen.

God help this once great nation!

Judge Perez Hilton, The Gay Bigamist

It can now be demonstrated finally, that the gay movement in this country is nothing more than the "Kings of Intolerence".

Openly gay Judge of the Miss America pageant, Perez Hilton, decided to ask Miss California the question of whether or not she supported "Gay Marriage" during the Miss America pageant, as if, that was a valid question in the first place. Exactly where does homosexuality fit in to the Miss America contest?

When Miss California, (Carrie Prejean), responded with complete honesty that she didn't support that personaly, he then went on to work with full force to ensure that she didn't win.

Gay bigot, Perez Hilton, even went beyond that. He went on to You Tube, and posted a video calling her a "bitch".

So, I would have to ask, where is his justification to do that? An honest answer to his question should have been rewarded as being such. Also, who does he think he is imposing his homosexual viewpoint into the Miss America contest?

Why was this hate-filled homosexual tool allowed to be a judge in the first place?

He has only served to make an ass of himself, and his cause in public.

Wait...maybe that is a good thing.

Perez Hilton, limp wristed moron, exposes his bigotry before the world, thereby, cancelling out his own viewpoint...

I like that.

Justice has been served - ironically.

Another "Brilliant" Choice By Barrack Obama

Barrack Obama's choice for The Department Of Homeland Defense, Janet Napolitano, is yet another clue as to either his incompetance, or his wish to destroy America as it is. I mean, his most obvious screw up choice was Treasury Secretary, Tim Geitner: who is a well known tax cheat. Yet Obama sticks by him? Go figure.

This new appointee, apart from trying to avoid such terms as "terrorists" with such innoucous terms as "man caused disasters", has gone on now, (in a documement that was intercepted from her department), to also imply that Veterans are also somehow, a threat to us in the form of "terrorism" internally - a term that she obviously had previously dissapproved of, yet its return, speaks volumes about her and her adminstration!

What's even worse, is that the report finds that people like me, who blog, and are for limited government are somehow, "Right Wing Extremist Terrorists", that are a threat to our country.

Really?

All I can say to that, is to say that I am extremely proud of being in the company of such brillant men as John Adams and Thomas Jefferson.

Will my blog last much longer? Only time will tell.

I am certain of one thing: I shall not recant! (In the spirit of Martin Luther).

Tea Party Fallout

On this past April, 15th, there were "Tea Party" protests all over our great country. The response from the left was nothing short of disengenous and out right lies. At the Atlanta Tea Party protest, CNN reporter, Susan Roesgan demonstrated on camera live, just what a leftist tool she really is.

She confronted a man who was holding his child in his arms and proceeded to ask him why he was there. What ensued was basically, her constantly interrupting him, not allowing him to express himself - with her eventually withdrawing with her camera man and making such statements of obvious lies as: "This is an anti-government demonstration that is not fit for kids, not "family friendly" in her words. This is, of course, a paraphrase of her libelous statements. But you get the point.

Once again, the left, and it's "Left-Wing Media", have exposed themselves for the actual hypocrites that they really are.

The very idea that the Tea Pary Protests were anti-government is ludicrous. The protests were comprised of average people of this country expressing their 1rst Ammendment rights to express their dissatisfaction with a government that is not operating along the lines of: "A government of the people, by the people", as the Constitution guarantees.

The very idea that the government can usurp our taxes to spend on bail outs, or whatever it wants to, without our actual say, is anathema!

Then, there is the accusation that Tea Parties weren't family viewing.

Oh, really?

I beg to differ.

These demonstrations from common Americans are, if nothing else, "family viewing" worthy. What better time to teach our children about the fundamentals of what America really is? What better time to honor our Founding Fathers, than to show them that we are a government "of the people and by the people" and that the peoples' voice really matters?!

Left Wing Media outfits like, CNN and MSNBC, to name a few, are guilty of hypocrisy in very aggregious ways. For example WHERE was the: "this is not family viewing" statement from them during the gay marches in San Francisco, which they all willingly covered, to include gays dressed up like clowns and invading, and disrupting Christian churches?

Where was the: "It's not appropriate family coverage" during the Code Pink, Anti-Bush protests? Where was this, all of a sudden, invented: "it's not family coverage", during the Cindy Sheehan media coverage? It wasn't there!

It wasn't there because the left in this country are hypocrites that want to fool you into believing that they are all about "tolerance" and what is "fair". Obviously, their "tolerance" ends whenever it involves the common American citizen.

This is obviously, a case where the Left in this country have a huge amount of egg on their faces.

The Tea Party Protests were, in the end, actually very American and very appropriate!

My wish is that this is just the beginning! Some on the left try to downplay it all with numbers, but keep in mind, these Tea Party protests were held on a a week day. The alleged small numbers don't account for others who agree with these protesters, but couldn't turn out on a week day due to work requirements.

Something tells me that, in the end, we are all going to learn that a vast amount of Americans don't want Obama's idea of "Change and Hope" They can smell the stench of socialism/communism from a mile away. And they are fighting mad!

We'll see.

Tomorrow, April 15th: America's Second Tea Party Protest

Tomorrow, April 15, 2009 - some 236 years after the first Tea Party protest held in America back in Boston, Massachusetts, on December 16 1773 - American citizens in various cities across our great nation are once again going to express their outrage over taxation that isn't fair.

Of course, in the original protest, loads of tea was actually tossed into the harbor, never reaching its destination Great Britain. No tea will be ruined tomorrow. These Tea Party protestors are just symbolically protesting a government that is unfairly taxing the citizens of its country.

Some are quick to point out that the original Boston Tea Party protest was about "taxation without representation" and that that, is simply not the case today in our Democratic Republican form of government.

I beg to differ.

The era of great statesmen in our government is long since over. Today, our Congress and other government officals are filled instead, with greedy politicians who only really care about one thing: power. Most politicians today only care about staying elected. They only pretend to listen to their constituents when election time comes near. This goes for politicians of both parties, Democrat and Republican.

If you still think you have representation in government, just try writing to your Senator or House Representative. You will quickly learn two things. First, you will receive a "form letter" that is nothing more than a canned response that is not coming from your representative in government, but rather from a paid staff member who acts as a buffer between you and your Congressman, who can't be bothered by your concerns. Second, the form letter will be full of meaningless thanks for your "concerns", but will never once address your concerns in any way. You can even try and write to your Congressman again, only to get the same meaningless form letter.

So, you see, "representation" is definatley no longer anything you have with respect to today's modern American government.

So, here we are once again. American citizens are outraged at being taxed without any appropriate representation. Our children and their children are going to drown in taxes to pay for the government's trillions of dollars, raised on their backs through taxation to pay for its irresponsible bail out or irresonsible and greedy corporations and for its ludicrous "economic stimulus" solution to "help save our economy".

AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, GM, and others should never have been bailed out from their greedy, irresponsible business actions. They should have been allowed to fail, go bankrupt, along with the greedy unions associated with them, (with respect to the car companies involved in this unfair bail out).

My hope is that the turnout tomorrow will far exceed the apathetic Americans watching this, like the actor Dennis Leary, who think that it will be only a small showing and we have to "pay our taxes".

The Tea Party protests tomorrow are America at its best. Citizens exercising their
1rst Ammendment rights to address their greivances toward a government that has become corrupt and unjust.

God bless those brave and patriotic Americans who turn out tomorrow to protest against a government that is threatening to plunge this great nation into economic ruin and dependancy on socialism - something that our Founding Fathers, along with all of the many brave and heroic Americans who gave their lives for our liberty - would find detestable. And rightfully so.

And all of this on the IRS's deadline to pay your taxes. The irony shouldn't be lost on anyone.

Kudos To President Obama

I am about to post something that might surprise like-minded readers as well as those who opposed to my viewpoint. I actually have a bit of praise to extend to President Obama.

President Obama did two great good things during this past Somali pirate incident against an American merchant ship.

First off, he kept his composure, and his mouth shut throughout all of Captain Phillips' hostage ordeal with the Somali pirates who had him captured on a life boat in the ocean in that area for the duration of 5 days. If he had been stupid enough to start speaking publicly with bravado, he might have gotten Captain Phillips killed.

Secondly, his authorization for the Navy Seals to use deadly force to resolve this situation cemented the Amercian position, that not only do we not negotiate with terrorists but, that if you mess with one of our own, you do so at peril to your own life.

Some, like Sean Hannity have criticized President Obama for taking credit for something that he was legally bound to do anyway, but, I say cut him some slack this time! Is Sean Hannity right? Maybe. But, the better point is that Obama did ultimately do the right thing with both his silence and restraint and his permission for the death of those subhuman, criminal pirates.

As Conservatives, we have a great opportunity to show that we are not the losers that the left were during George W. Bush's term, who even if he had single handely cured cancer would have still been calling him all kinds of names from, "Hitler" to "idiot", "monkey", and "War Criminal" for example.

I expect conservatives to act at a level much higher than the hate-filled, idiotic members of the "intellectual" (a stretch), "compassionate" (yet another stretch) left.

Obama's "Apologize For America Tour 2009"

Recently Obama toured throughout Europe and parts of the Middle East in an attempt to present to them "a new America". One common theme in all of his speeches in the different countries was an apology for America's past reputation and behavior. As the leader of our country, is he suppose to be advocating America's interests or is he suppose to be apologizing for our interests? Does he really have America's best interest in mind?

I would agree, as would any sane person who has been paying attention to American history, that sometimes America has acted...well wrong, or even maybe, arrogant. But is his tour of the world really the place to state that? Or are there better venues for such a confession. The better question might be, hasn't the vast amount of sacrifice we have made for the welfare of these nations overshadowed our moments of arrogance?

Apparently Obama isn't even the least bit interested in asking that question. Instead, he thinks that by undergoing some sort of twisted "confession" before the world it will somehow, atone America's past misdeeds in the eyes of the rest of the world who, quite frankly hate us anyway and are blinded by jealousy.

As it turns out, he was dead wrong. In Great Britain, his groveling was met with howls of derision from the British press from all backgrounds of view. One particularly leftist newspaper carried an editorial column that basically called him nothing but a huge bore, and wondered why he hadn't left the country yet.

Obama's bow to the King of Saudi Arabia hasn't been lost on his many critics from the right. Since when does the President, of a country whose very existence was founded on contempt for monarchy, bow before another King?

Of course, the White House instantly began fabricating excuses for why he did such a thing, (which does nothing more than reinforce the fact that he did, in fact, bow.)

Now, I personally don't care whether his bow was protocol for cultural respect or not. It does however, send an unintended message of weakness to our Islamic-Fascist terrorist enemies. It tends to reinforce Osama Bin Laden's claim in the late 1990's that we are really nothing more than "paper tigers", thus emboldening them in their cause.

Obama's idiotic notion that talks can calm the whole situation down, is at best, naive, at worse, treasonous. I personally go with the former, but, nonetheless, I am not confident that he is really capable of preserving the liberty and safety of our union.

He, along with the far left peacenicks in this country, doesn't seem to grasp the fact that we are engaged with an enemy whose main goal is the toppling of Western Civilization and replacing it with the bonds of slavery to their 1500 AD, backwards, repressive religious-legal view. Their murderos goals don't stop with the entire genocide of Israel.

I hope that Obama will wake up soon. If not, God forbid that we have to all endure the damage of an 8 year term under this extremely misguided, liberal oaf of a President.

Hey, but at least, we have America's first black President. ; )