In My Right Mind

"We all do no end of feeling, and we mistake it for thinking." - Mark Twain

My Photo
Location: Universal City, Texas, United States

"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take away everything you have." - Thomas Jefferson

Saturday, April 29, 2006

Wow! I Wish I Could Have Written This.

I. S. Wichman, a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University found himself in the news when he sent a protest letter to the Pro Muslim organization CAIR who in turn took his private e-mail sent to them and used it to incite the Muslim students at the university to protest him and call for his discharge from employment at the university.

Professor Wichman’s e-mail was sent in counter to the Muslim outrage worldwide at the recent derogatory cartoons released from Denmark and other places over the Internet mocking their founder, Mohammed and the Islamo-Fascist terrorist movement in general.

Liberatarian, radio talk show host, Neil Boortz’ posted the professors e-mail to CAIR on his webpage. Here it is:

"Dear Moslem Association: As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest.

I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey!), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavain girls and women (called "whores" in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris France.

This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many, many of my colleagues. I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Moslems to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile "protests."

If you do not like the values of the West -- see the 1st Amendment -- you are free to leave. I hope for God's sake that most of you choose that option. Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.

Cordially, I. S. Wichman, Professor of Mechanical Engineering"

It looks like the Professor has hit the proverbial nail smack dab on it’s head. Apparently, his sentiments are shared by a great many Americans. You can peruse a slew of comments * made at Detroit Free Press’s comment board which poses the question, “How should MSU respond to professor’s comments?”.

Did the professor have the right to send such an e-mail to CAIR? You bet. The First Amendment guarantees him that right. Did CAIR and the Muslim students at MSU have the right to protest Professor Wichman’s e-mail? You bet. Again, the First Amendment guarantees them that right. Does MSU have the right to fire Professor Wichman? Absolutely not. That would be an egregious violation of his constitutional right to freedom of speech.

There has been some misunderstanding regarding Wichamn’s e-mail. First, and foremost it should be pointed out, that regardless of any University policy, Wichman’s e-mail was not sent to the Muslim students on campus. It was sent to an off-campus organization, CAIR.

Second, therefore, he was not espousing his opinion in his college classroom, (which of course liberal, anti-American professors do on a daily basis, no matter how far their political opinions are from the subject matter of their course), so any university policy would not apply.

Those students can protest all they want, but they along with CAIR, and for that matter all of the Muslims in the world don’t deserve “special rights” above the rights of others.
They don’t have the right to just their own view point with no dissent against it.

I agree with Professor Wichman totally. If they don’t like dissent of their viewpoint, they might as well just leave our country. We are not about to change our Constitution just for them or anybody else for that matter. They are living in Western Civilization’s greatest country. If Western ideals and lifestyles bother them, then the solution is simple, go back to the Middle East. They can go to a country that is dominated and under the control of Islamic leaders. Then, they will be right at home, and not have to listen to any opinion contrary to their own.

Isn’t it funny how silent the Muslim community was after 9/11? How silent they were after the murderous beheading of Daniel Pearl? How silent they were after the gruesome slow, beheading of Nicholas Berg? The only time they open their collective mouths is either to warn us that they may in danger of blowback persecution or discrimination or to turn out in droves in protest to the recent derogatory cartoons. So, apparently they can turn out in great numbers to express their outrage. When they want to. When it is in their best interest.

Until the Muslim community comes out blatantly against the atrocities done in the name of their religion by the bloodthirsty, hate filled, demon possessed terrorists, no decent person is going to look at them with anything other than suspicion. The impression is that while they may not be swinging the sword to behead Westerners, they are holding the coat of the Islamo-Fascist demon, while he slaughters the innocent in the name of Allah.

Professor Wichman effectively puts the ball back into the Muslim court. How are they going to respond?

* Due to technical difficulties with blogspot's format, the embedded link to this site doesn't work. So here is the link to the Detroit Press's comment site:

Another Good Reason America Doesn't Need John Kerry As It's President

In the midst of the liberal’s hypocritical defense of CIA agent Mary McCarthy who was fired for leaking classified information to the press, former democratic presidential hopeful, John Kerry (“who by the way served in Vietnam”) joined in. In an article posted on the “Drudge Report” website, Kerry commented in an interview with ABC “This Week” host, George Stephanopoulos. Kerry’s words, as usual, speak volumes as to his unfitness at being able to lead this country as President. Here is some of that interview:

ABC 'THIS WEEK' HOST GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: On another -- on another front, excuse me, CIA official Mary McCarthy lost her job this week for disclosing classified information according to the CIA probably about a WASHINGTON POST story which reveal revealed the existence of secret prisons in Europe. A lot of different views. Senator Pat Roberts praised action but some former CIA officers described Mary McCarthy as a sacrificial lamb acting in the finest American tradition by revealing human rights violations. What's your view?

SEN. KERRY: Well, I read that. I don't know whether she did it or not so it's hard to have a view on it. Here's my fundamental view of this, that you have somebody being fired from the CIA for allegedly telling the truth, and you have no one fired from the white house for revealing a CIA agent in order to support a lie. That underscores what's really wrong in Washington, DC Here.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That's one issue of hypocrisy but should a CIA officer be able to make decisions on his or her -- KERRY: ... Of course not. Of course, not. A CIA agent has the obligation to uphold the law and clearly leaking is against the law, and nobody should leak. I don't like leaking. But if you're leaking to tell the truth, Americans are going to look at that, at least mitigate or think about what are the consequences that you, you know, put on that person. Obviously they're not going to keep their job, but there are other larger issues here. You know, classification in Washington is a tool that is used to hide the truth from the American people. Daniel Patrick Moynihan was eloquent and forceful in always talking about how we needed to, you know, end this endless declassification that takes place in this city, and it has become a tool to hide the truth from Americans. STEPHANOPOULOS: These -- SEN. KERRY: So I'm glad she told the truth but she's going to obviously -- if she did it, if she did it, suffer the consequences of breaking the law.

So, basically once you get past all of Kerry’s spin, Kerry thinks that:

The non outing of Valerie Plume who was not a covert agent for the CIA, and was in fact well known in Washington DC’s circles, and so couldn’t possibly be “outed” by the very definition of the word, is of more importance than CIA agent, Mary McCarthy’s leaking of classified information to the press. Which, by the way, puts the lives of the U.S. and coalition soldiers at the locations she revealed in jeopardy as well as jeopardizes their mission in the war against terrorism.

Even though she might have to face jail time for her leak, she did the right thing. After all, telling the truth to the American public is of paramount importance. This coming from a man who still has his military medical records sealed. So much for his belief in getting the truth out to the American people.

The Valerie Plume affair was in the end, after all the racket the liberally-biased main stream media and the Democrats made over it had run its course, a non-event. But the Democrats who are desperate to regain power latched on to it and through deceptive spin tried to use it to strike a blow at the Bush administration. They failed. And it just demonstrated to any Americans who are paying attention, that the Democrats are a bunch of sore losers who have no plan to offer America except constantly taking cheap shots at our current President and his administration.

The Mary McCarthy incident on the other hand, does have critical consequences. Leaking out classified locations of internment camps through out Europe to the press is a criminal activity. All who have access to classified information are responsible for its safekeeping and have to sign an agreement outlining their responsibilities as well as the punishment they face if they divulge the classified information to any outside source.
That McCarthy was fired by the CIA is a good thing. She also should be spending time in federal prison.

John Kerry’s ridiculous praise for her releasing the truth to the press serves to illustrate why it is a very good thing that he is not the President of the United States and therefore, the Commander and Chief of our armed forces. The dangerous implications from his highly irresponsible statements are that if you disagree with the Federal Government and its actions then you can feel free to divulge any classified information to the press, and that you would be doing the right thing.

I am so very thankful that John Kerry wasn’t elected President. For two elections now we have nearly come close to getting men of questionable character and leadership abilities elected. I dread to think what America post 9/11 would be like had Al Gore been the Commander in Chief. Had Kerry won, the war on terror would likely have been ditched, or turned over to impotent UN with a large storm of such repercussions coming swiftly at us over the horizon.

There are some things that George W. Bush has done that are questionable (i.e. his guest worker proposal and his overall handling of the illegal immigration problem in our country and its dangerously open borders, and his attempt at involving government in the gas price issues), but there is no question he was, and is the right man to be at the reigns after that horrible day, 9/11 happened.

Monday, April 17, 2006

Democrat Party Return To Power?

There is some speculation that if the Republican Party doesn’t get its act together and start listening to its voters, then they might very well lose in the November elections handing the reigns back over to the Democrats. Newt Gingrich make this point very well in an article you can find here.

I hate to admit it, but I happen to agree. As a conservative, I vote Republican because it is the political party that comes the closest to representing my political beliefs. I, and I believe the rest of the voters in this country, (if they were paying attention), learned from the Ross Perot debacle that this country is not ready to be anything other than a two party system.

I have been frustrated with the Republican Party the last few years. They have been given the reigns and have just balked. They refuse to take the lead, and spend too much time pandering to the opposition from the Democrats instead of defeating it head on.

The first frustration for me was the infamous “Contract With America” that got the Republicans, led by Newt Gingrich, back into majority control of Congress. As it turned out their “contract” amounted to little more than some nice ideas and promises that just never materialized.

George W. Bush has been elected for two terms, and despite having a Republican majority in Congress has refused, or has been unable, to take advantage of his opportunity to steer this country back onto the right track, (pun intended), and away from the socialist, globalism influence that the left is trying to poison us with.

It was pointed out to me once by someone that both political parties are for bigger government and more government spending. They just focus on different areas of control for the government to seek and to spend the tax payer’s money on. I have found this to be basically true.

The problem for the Republican Party is that, while it does a good job of wooing the conservative vote, it hardly ever follows through with the conservative agenda that it promised to support. They worry more about polls than they do actually gaining the confidence and respect of their voting base.

I suspect I am not the only conservative out there who is becoming more and more disenfranchised with the Republican Party.

This growing disenchantment could spell an unfortunate victory for the Democrats and, therefore the liberal movement.

You see, unlike the Republican Party, the Democrat Party is dominated by liberal agenda. It doesn’t just woo liberals for their vote, it is, by and large liberal itself.

So what to do? I’m certainly not about to throw my vote towards the Democrats by voting for a third party. And there is no way I would ever vote the Democrat ticket, at least not as long as it continues down it's Marxist influenced, "legislate from the Supreme Court", "the Constitution is a living document" path.

If the unthinkable should occur, and the liberals win back control of the country here are some of the things you can expect to see happen, or perhaps be pursued by a government in the hands of liberal leadership, in no particular order.

First, our troops will be pulled out of Iraq and Afghanistan post haste. The left have been screaming ad nauseum that we don’t belong over there and our troops are stuck in a quagmire, ineffectual and dying by the thousands for no good reason. They will act swiftly on this.

When they do force our fighting men and women back home, you can expect the following. Once again, the Iraqis will learn that you can’t count on the U.S. She will always leave you in a lurch. The country will either turn into a bloody civil war disaster, or the Islamo-Fascist hotheads will assume command. If you think Saddam Hussein was bad, try living under the control of bloodthirsty, hate-filled, demon possessed terrorists and their nightmarish vision.

The people of Afghanistan will learn the painful lesson about U.S. fidelity that their neighbors have had to endure, now twice with America’s second abandonment. You can expect the Taliban to regain power, and life for the women of Afghanistan, and every one else who doesn’t agree with their insanely restrictive “shove Islam down everyone’s throats” style of government to take a severe dive in terms of quality and promise.

Any hope of having two more Islamic democracies in the Middle East would be dashed.
Those fallen US soldiers who died liberating Afghanistan and Iran, like Casey Sheehan's son, would then have died in vain.

All of this thanks to the liberal agenda.

Second, you can expect that our military will be farmed out to support the UN in whatever meaningless endeavor the UN wishes to pursue, (talk about being in a quagmire and the senseless loss of American lives!).

Liberals love the ideals of globalism with its vision of “one world, one government”. They are ashamed of America’s superpower status, and wish to bring America down a notch or two.

Other things that could be on the liberal agenda could be granting other nations the ability to arrest and extradite American military personnel to be tried for “war crimes”, Supreme Court rulings being guided by other nations’ interpretations and philosophies, and it wouldn’t surprise me if they didn’t toy with the idea of opening up American elections to the voting populace of the nations of the world.

I’d like to think that that last item is highly unlikely, but it would be consistent with the liberal globalist’ agenda. They do crave the respect of Europe and the rest of the world and they are embarrassed and ashamed by the actions of America now, and in the past as a superpower. They especially don’t like the idea of America being a lone superpower. To appease and try and win the respect of the rest of the world they are willing to let the rest of the world determine who will lead the world's only superpower.

Third, you can expect to kiss the tax break you got from the Bush Administration goodbye, and face even more taxes than before.

Fourth, you can expect that with all of the money they can squeeze out the American worker they will squander it on more socialist programs that don’t actually solve any problems, but ensure the dependence of the free-loaders in this country on the government and secure their vote.

Fifth, illegal aliens, “undocumented workers” would be given automatic citizenship and voting rights. Social programs would be financed through heavy taxation of authentic American citizens and aimed at these "new citizens" to ensure the vote of the illegal aliens would always go toward keeping the liberals in power. And of course, it will send a message loud and clear to the rest of Latin America, "come on over and become an automatic American citizen, we will even give you free handouts!

Never mind the fact that countless immigrants from Europe, Mexico, Latin America, Asia have sacrificed to obtain citizenship into this country the right way. When it comes to Mexican aliens, they will get special, preferential treatment.

And of course, never mind the rise in drug trafficking into America, or the unhindered path into our cities afforded to al Qaeda and other terrorist groups who mean us harm. After all, there will be nothing in place to hinder "undocumented workers" from coming to the "land of plenty" and helping themselves to what is not rightly theirs, but granted to them by the kinder liberal government.

Sixth, since liberals tend to view the Constitution as a “living document” you can expect more and more of it be reinterpreted in a more modern, enlightened, progressive manner (read, converted slowly but surely into a Communist/Socialist Manifesto).

Seventh, if you think the public school system is a mess now, it hasn’t even begun to deteriorate. Schools will funnel the liberal world view into the heads of our children ensuring the indoctrination of future generations into the liberal secular, humanist, communist/socialist viewpoint. Given enough time, generations can be effectively brainwashed with a one-sided view, to believe the way it is, is the best of all possible ways.

Am I saying that the liberals would accomplish these and other items on their agenda once they regained control of the Congress and possibly the Presidency? No, of course not. But just look at what they were able to accomplish in the last half of the past century. We are already well on our way down the path they envision for us. The Republicans have been too busy watching their status in the polls to bother with overturning the damage that the decades of Democratic rule managed to inflict.

Public schools are failing to provide for a good education, but there is no shortage of liberal programs being aimed at students. Critical thinking skills aren’t taught in schools. And I maintain there is a motive behind its absence in the schools around this nation's cirriculum.

The liberal’s plan for the secularization of America has already created plenty of damaging erosion to the moral fabric of our society. Marriages and families fall apart on a regular basis. The poisonous philosophy of relativism has introduced a myriad of immorality and filth into our popular culture. Liberal successes via their misinterpretation of the First Amendment “Separation of Church and State” ploy is succeeding in de-Christianizing America, and denying citizens the freedom of expression of their religion in public.

Am I saying that they would automatically get away with their agenda? No. I would like to think that as they tried to slip their agenda in, bright Americans would rise to the occasion and vote them out of power. But, even so, just because there is not any guarantee they could remain in power long enough, to completley re-invent America according to their communist/socialist vision doesn’t mean that they wouldn’t try. Unlike the Republican party that tries to capitulate to angry Democrats, the Democrats would do with their power what the Republicans should have and that is ignore the temper tantrums coming from the Republican party and push ahead with their agenda.

A vote for the Democratic Part is a vote for the liberal agenda for America. It is a vote that will weaken our military defense, farm it out to the UN, and relegate our national defense and defense of our national interests to the UN. It is a vote to constantly increase the tax burden and severely decrease the quality of the American way of life as a plethora of many more useless socialist programs will be funded on the backs of the American worker. A vote for the Democratic Party is a vote for extremely diminished Homeland Defense, and wide open, unprotected borders. A vote for the Democratic Party would be a very bad choice indeed.

Friday, April 14, 2006

Good Friday, PETA Style

The “animals are people too”, group of loons called PETA are back in the news again. It appears that they have chosen to crash the Christian Holy Day, Good Friday, to try and make their lunatic cause somehow relevant. This group of unhinged moonbats decided that it would be a good idea to march about the streets of Vienna today, Good Friday, carrying three crosses, each with a PETA nut attached to them with an animal mask over his or her head.

As if desecrating the event of Christ’s death on the cross visually wasn’t enough, they also carried signs making the ludicrous statement: “We suffer and die for your sins of nourishment.”

A spokesman for PETA, Bob Friedrich had this to say on behalf of their demonstration:

“Words and images aren't offensive to God," he said. "What is offensive to God is the satanic treatment of God's creature by factory farms and slaughterhouses.”

This coming from an organization that was exposed for their crime of the wholesale slaughtering of pets turned over to them for their care and protection and then discarding the animal carcasses in garbage dumpsters. [So much for PETA's "animals are equal with humans and have special rights" claptrap].

Just who is guilty of satanic treatment here?

I would say that it takes one to know one but, killing animals to eat them is hardly "satanic". However, murdering them in cold blood after they have been entrusted to you for their care most certainly is that is, if the term “satanic” can be used in relation to the destruction of animals.

Personally, I think their demonstration could have been handled better by simply marching along side them with Protest Signs that state something along the lines of:

“PETA’s Next Step For Animals: First, PETA Tried Slitting the Innocent Animals' Throats and Dumping Them In Garbage Dumpsters. Now PETA Proposed to Kill Them Slowly Via Crucifixion and Then Dump Their Carcasses In Garbage Disposals”

The good thing about moonbat organizations like PETA is that the more they speak out in public, the more they demonstrate to the public what a bunch of arrogant idiots they truly are.

Thursday, April 13, 2006

She's Baaackkk!!!!!

The left’s most popular moonbat is back. Cindy Sheehan is camping out again near President Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas. She’s even sporting a John Lennon T-Shirt and holding up the obligatory peace sign gesture. So, what does the attention-starved aging hippie want now? Well, pretty much the same thing as before.

Here are some highlights from the article that illustrate this moonbat and her twisted logic:

The anti-war demonstrators accused Bush, who has spent every Easter at his Crawford ranch since he was elected, of running from them and their message to bring the U.S. troops home from Iraq immediately.

"We chased him away from his ranch," said Sheehan, whose son Casey was killed in Iraq in 2004. "We protest all over the country without him being in attendance, so I don't think it takes away (from this vigil) a bit because he never met with us anyway. It wasn't even like we ever sat down and had sweet tea together."

"We're going to do what we do all the time: gather together in peace," Sheehan said. "We're going to call for George Bush and the neo-cons not to invade Iran. That would be a mistake even worse than Iraq. Our children are sitting ducks in the Middle East; the people of Iran and Iraq would be sitting ducks. And I'm not even sure that this invasion won't lead to World War III. So it's something that we have to stop before it starts."

So, moonbat Sheehan thinks she has the President on the run? Talk about your “delusions of grandeur”. Apparently Cindy has the audacity and arrogance to think that she, of all of the other mothers who have lost sons in this war against terrorism, rises to the top in priority, and that President Bush owes it to her to meet with her personally.

Yeah, right.

Cindy is worried about our troops if we deal with Iran. Why? Does she think our troops are that incompetent? We have the finest trained military in the world. The finest military in the world is surely not “sitting ducks”. [This is the same bogus panic talk that came from the left prior to our invasion of Iraq. Remember the warnings of the thousands and thousands of U.S. casualties and the enormous amount of time it would take]. The left was embarrassingly wrong then, and Cindy, apparently hasn’t learned from the left’s lesson.

If we don’t confront Iran before she is armed to the hilt with nuclear bombs, we will indeed be facing WWIII. But, just like the rest of the appeasement crowd from the left, Cindy apparently feels that if we just ignore Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and talk nice to them [read, kiss their ass] then they will just magically abandon their view of the U.S. as the “Great Satan”, and never, ever target us with their nuclear weapons.

She apparently thinks that her silly little demonstrations are going to somehow make President Bush come to her. What Cindy Sheehan doesn’t seem to get, is the fact that President Bush is far too busy with things that matter to cater to her selfish, wrongheaded agenda.

Here’s a tip to Cindy: Too much time spent whining in the spotlight will eventually back fire on you and the only attention you will get is from the hot sun burning down on you, and of course those pesky flies that come out during warmer weather. It’s time to get over yourself and move on.

I agree with Cindy that peace is preferable. But, at what cost? I am not willing to live in “peace” with Islamic, bloodthirsty, terrorists if it means living in submission to them and their demonic plans for mankind [worse for womankind].

Perhaps, Cindy doesn’t cherish the freedom she enjoys by living in the U.S. I do. And I am willing to fight for it. How about you?

Monday, April 03, 2006

The Grand Hypocrisy of the ACLU

The bloggers over at Stop The recently posted an article, which mentioned the plans for the Muslim Youth Camp of America from Cedar Rapids, Iowa to built on 114 acres of federal land in Lake Coralville, Iowa. The camp will run around $934,000 and when built will be leased out to the group for 25 years.

Here are some of the highlights posted:

"Plans for the $934,000 camp north of North Liberty call for lodging up to 60 campers ages 10 to 17 in cabins and tents plus staffers during the summer and up to 40 per night in the offseason. When completed, the camp will include a 2,400 square-foot lodge, a beach, recreation trails, five cabins, five tent pods and a bathroom."

"Bill Aossey, Representative for MYCA, announced that the camp/convention center "has been purchased and given the name Camp Heritage to emphasize the importance for Muslim children of understanding their roots."

"These statements, including the fact that the proposed site will contain of a 36-foot dome-covered prayer tower..."

"If this doesn’t bother you enough, the Militant Islam Monitor points out even more disturbing details. Bill Aossey attends the Cedar Rapids Islamic Center. The website for the center contains numerous extremist and hate links, including a link to Al Haramain, the foundation that was one of the “principal players in charity-based financing of al-Qaeda” (December 20, 2002, National Review On-Line)."

"Bill was a featured speaker at the 2002 and 2003 Iowa Muslim Student Association Annual Conferences. At the 2002 Conference, he gave a speech entitled "Martyrdom in Islam." Martyrdom is considered a code word for suicide bombings. Also speaking at the 2002 Conference was Siraj Wahhaj, an individual that is alleged to have been a co-conspirator of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. At the 2003 Conference, Bill was joined by feature speaker Nihad Awad. Awad is the Executive Director of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and an ex-member of the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), a front group for the terrorist organization Hamas. It has been reported that MYCA plans to rent out its proposed convention center in the off-season. Is it possible that the 2004 Conference will be held there?"

Where is the ACLU on this? The answer is, they are hiding in the shadowy background in total silence.

You see, the only time they bother to drag out their bogus "separation of Church and State" argument is when someone notices a tiny Christian cross that has been in a city seal for years and years, or when some display of the Ten Commandments is hanging on the walls of a state’s courthouse, or the display of a manger scene on federal property.

The article cites even more of the ACLU’s preferred cases when it involves Christianity.
But, let a Muslim organization build a camp, complete with a 36 foot domed prayer tower on federal property, and the old "separation of Church and State" outrage and duty to challenge the violation of this illusionary liberal tenet disappears.

This is an outrage. But I am not surprised. I have yet to see any beneficial service the ACLU offers to American society. I have, however, noted the destructive things that they have managed to accomplish. The way I see it, if ACLU were to disband, America and the Constitution would be much better off.

Sunday, April 02, 2006

The Democratic Party's "War Face" (That They Have Only Recently Found)

So, It would appear that the Democratic Party has decided that just chanting irrational “Bush is Hitler” rants isn’t enough to get them elected. Now they have decided to put on their “war face”. The problem is, what they propose as their positions regarding Osama Bin Laden, al Qaeda, and Iraq amount to only “Republican-light”. In a story here, democrats are pronouncing to Americans their miraculous strategies.

They pronounce that they will hunt down and find Osama Bin Laden straight away. They don’t say how they will do this. But, we are all expected to just accept, without proof of any sort, that the anti-war, appeasement party is somehow experts when it comes to capturing Osama Bin Laden. It would be laughable, if it wasn’t for the fact that they know exactly what they are doing.

The Democrat Part has become experts at duping people into putting their voting trust in them. They pronounce themselves to be champions for the poor, the downtrodden, and attract the attention of both, those people and those of better means, with altruistic goals.
The problem is, upon closer examination, FDR’s “New Deal”, LBJ’s “Great Society”, and the myriad of other socialist programs that they have been able to hood-wink the American taxpayer to reach deep into their pockets to support have done nothing to eliminate poverty or elevate society’s “downtrodden”.

The Democratic Party’s “War on Poverty” is no war at all. It is nothing more than clever smoke and mirrors. The democrats need the poor. Even more, they need to keep them poor. The poor must continually depend upon their socialist programs to lift them up. Of course, the programs don’t do one thing to lift the poor from their poverty. On the contrary, it keeps them depending on the “crumbs” that the democratic socialist form of government will hand out to them. It’s a real shame that the poor class in this country hasn’t made that connection yet.

Mark my words, the democrats are no more capable, or willing to confront and end the terrorist threat of Bin Laden and al Qaeda than they are to actually end poverty. They just know that noble words will fool those incapable of critical thinking to pull the voting levers in their favor.

Would a vote for the Democratic Party ensure that we get Osama Bin Laden (as if his capture would end the terrorist threat from al Qaeda), and put an end to the al Qaeda threat?

What do you think?