She's Baaackkk!!!!!
The left’s most popular moonbat is back. Cindy Sheehan is camping out again near President Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas. She’s even sporting a John Lennon T-Shirt and holding up the obligatory peace sign gesture. So, what does the attention-starved aging hippie want now? Well, pretty much the same thing as before.
Here are some highlights from the article that illustrate this moonbat and her twisted logic:
The anti-war demonstrators accused Bush, who has spent every Easter at his Crawford ranch since he was elected, of running from them and their message to bring the U.S. troops home from Iraq immediately.
"We chased him away from his ranch," said Sheehan, whose son Casey was killed in Iraq in 2004. "We protest all over the country without him being in attendance, so I don't think it takes away (from this vigil) a bit because he never met with us anyway. It wasn't even like we ever sat down and had sweet tea together."
"We're going to do what we do all the time: gather together in peace," Sheehan said. "We're going to call for George Bush and the neo-cons not to invade Iran. That would be a mistake even worse than Iraq. Our children are sitting ducks in the Middle East; the people of Iran and Iraq would be sitting ducks. And I'm not even sure that this invasion won't lead to World War III. So it's something that we have to stop before it starts."
So, moonbat Sheehan thinks she has the President on the run? Talk about your “delusions of grandeur”. Apparently Cindy has the audacity and arrogance to think that she, of all of the other mothers who have lost sons in this war against terrorism, rises to the top in priority, and that President Bush owes it to her to meet with her personally.
Yeah, right.
Cindy is worried about our troops if we deal with Iran. Why? Does she think our troops are that incompetent? We have the finest trained military in the world. The finest military in the world is surely not “sitting ducks”. [This is the same bogus panic talk that came from the left prior to our invasion of Iraq. Remember the warnings of the thousands and thousands of U.S. casualties and the enormous amount of time it would take]. The left was embarrassingly wrong then, and Cindy, apparently hasn’t learned from the left’s lesson.
If we don’t confront Iran before she is armed to the hilt with nuclear bombs, we will indeed be facing WWIII. But, just like the rest of the appeasement crowd from the left, Cindy apparently feels that if we just ignore Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and talk nice to them [read, kiss their ass] then they will just magically abandon their view of the U.S. as the “Great Satan”, and never, ever target us with their nuclear weapons.
She apparently thinks that her silly little demonstrations are going to somehow make President Bush come to her. What Cindy Sheehan doesn’t seem to get, is the fact that President Bush is far too busy with things that matter to cater to her selfish, wrongheaded agenda.
Here’s a tip to Cindy: Too much time spent whining in the spotlight will eventually back fire on you and the only attention you will get is from the hot sun burning down on you, and of course those pesky flies that come out during warmer weather. It’s time to get over yourself and move on.
I agree with Cindy that peace is preferable. But, at what cost? I am not willing to live in “peace” with Islamic, bloodthirsty, terrorists if it means living in submission to them and their demonic plans for mankind [worse for womankind].
Perhaps, Cindy doesn’t cherish the freedom she enjoys by living in the U.S. I do. And I am willing to fight for it. How about you?
1 Comments:
Absolutely right, my friend. Doesn't this nut know her 15 minutes are over?
Yes, peace is preferable, but to what?
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." - John Stuart Mill
"Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry
Post a Comment
<< Home