Human Rights For Demon Possessed, Sub-Human Vermin?
The Blair administration in Great Britain is making good it’s resolve to toss any Islamic, demon possessed murders out of their country. Here are some highlights from a story found here:
British authorities arrested 10 foreigners Thursday with plans to deport them as a "threat to national security," authorities reported. Those detained apparently include a Jordanian-born cleric accused of having links to both al Qaeda and the terrorists who carried out the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.
Home Secretary Charles Clarke, who overseas domestic security, did not identify those detained or the precise reasons for their detention in a written statement. But the BBC and other media reported that the group included Abu Qatada, the radical cleric whose taped sermons were found in a Hamburg, Germany, apartment used by several of the Sept. 11 attackers.
"The circumstances of our national security have changed. It is vital that we act against those who threaten it," said Clarke, who oversees domestic security. He was referring to last month's train and bus bombings in London, which killed 56 people and wounded 700 more in the deadliest attack on British soil in a half-century.
Wow. You know, if the stupid American voters start to feel sorry for the democratic whiners, who just can’t get over the fact that they aren’t the dominant force in Congress or the White House, and vote them back into power, then you and I will be a whole lot safer moving to Great Britain.
There is no way a liberal dominated government in the U.S. would ever put their appeasing PC posture aside and actually weed out the terrorists from our country. [Note: a liberal will only become concerned about the terrorist threat when the sword blade is at his or her throat, the family members of victims of terrorist violence are admonished to "take the moral high ground" i.e. the appeasement position]
At least Great Britain recognizes the imperative to maintain their freedom and get rid of the terrorists in their midst!
Officials in the United States and Britain believe Abu Qatada, 44, is an important al Qaeda figure in Europe. He was once described by a British judge as "a truly dangerous individual at the center in the U.K. of terrorist activities associated with al Qaeda."
Qatada, whose real name is Oman Uthman Abu Omar, was arrested on suspicion of terrorism under emergency laws passed by the British government following the Sept. 11 attacks. British officials wanted to deport him to Jordan, but British human rights laws forbid sending people to a country where they might face mistreatment or the death penalty.
What? Human rights for sub-human vermin like Qatada? Please! Qatada and the rest of the Islamo-fascist terrorists surrendered their humanity when they began worshiping a demon god who demands rivers of blood from innocent people. Hacking innocent people’s heads off, and sending "homicide bombers" to massacre hundreds upon hundreds of innocent people is not a characteristic of a creature that deserves human right considerations.
Instead the government used the new anti-terrorism laws to jail Qatada and ten other men indefinitely without charge, leading human rights activists to label Belmarsh Prison, where they were being held, as "Britain's Guantanamo," a reference to the U.S. military detention facility in Cuba.
Last December a panel of British justices ruled that the anti-terrorism policies violated human rights and were discriminatory because they applied to foreigners only. Qatada and seven others were released in March after Qatada had served about 2 1/2 years and others had served more than three years without being charged.
Oh, goodness me. We can’t possibly discriminate against a bloodthirsty terrorist who only wants to murder as many of our citizens as he possibly can to appease his demon god!
The special immigration appeals judge who freed the men ordered them held under "control orders," a form of house arrest under which they were subject to curfews, electronic tagging, regular searches of their homes and a ban on the use of cell phones and computers.
That’s right. Impose curfews, and take away cell phone and computer access and the terrorists among your midst will cave in, change their "naughty ways", and become good little British citizens.
Thursday's detentions come a day after Britain and Jordan reached an agreement that includes assurances from Jordan that those deported would not be mistreated. British officials are also in negotiations to reach similar accords with nine other countries, including Lebanon and Algeria, where others detained today are reportedly citizens.
"If these men can be safely deported now, why has the Home Office claimed for so many years that that was impossible?" said Gareth Peirce, a lawyer who represents several of the men detained Thursday, calling the detentions "insane and dangerous government at its worse."
Peirce issued a statement saying that the men have been "deliberately put out of reach of lawyers who represent them." She said the government was wrong to rely on assurances from Jordan or Algeria that they have changed their practices "overnight" and said "Jordan and Algeria are at the top of every list of countries known to use the most brutal of forbidden measures."
Other than Ms. Peirce and other idiotic cowards like her, who cares whether or not Jordon will play nice with these terrorist thugs. It wouldn’t bother me the teeniest bit if the Jordanian and Algerian governments decided to saw these terrorists heads off to the chants of "Allah Akbar".
Human rights officials expressed concern Thursday.
"The assurances of known torturers -- many of whom deny the use of torture even when it is widely documented -- are not worth the paper they are written on," said Mike Blakemore, a spokesman for Amnesty International in the United Kingdom. "We have seen no indication of any monitoring to ensure that these promises are honored."
Blakemore said Amnesty believes that the British government must prevent more attacks and bring those responsible for last month's attacks to justice. "But going soft on torture is not the answer to terrorism," he said.
Once again, we get to witness the standard liberal lie that they believe we must do everything in our power to prevent any more terrorists attacks, while at the same time, complaining about each and every reasonable attempt to do just that.
Shami Chakrabarti, director of the British human rights group Liberty, said, "What separates us from the terrorists is that we do not torture people or send them to be tortured. It should take more than self-serving assurances to demonstrate that countries with a human rights record such as Jordan's are safe."
No. What separates us from the terrorists is that we don’t condone forcing people to view our screwed up view of religion at sword point. We don’t treat our women like chattle. We don’t make it our policy to murder innocent civilians in cold blood in the name of our demon god. Committing genocide against the people of Israel, and Jews around the world is not one of our goals.
There’s a good reason that Western civilization has advanced while Arabic civilization remains in the 11th century. Western ideas like freedom, respect for the individual and his or her rights, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom to be whatever you desire, study what you want, invent, dream etc. have enabled our civilization to progress.
On the other hand, the barbaric ideas of Wahhabists like Osama Bin Laden and his demonic army, al Qaeda, have ensured that Arabic culture remains one that is depicted as being comprised of picnic blankets wrapped around the heads of men, women so veiled that you can’t tell whether or not they are women, tents, camels, desert heat mixed together with hatred and jealousy.
It’s really ironic that the people who introduced the concept of the number zero have exactly zero contributions toward the advancement of human kind's potential in making the world a better place.
British authorities arrested 10 foreigners Thursday with plans to deport them as a "threat to national security," authorities reported. Those detained apparently include a Jordanian-born cleric accused of having links to both al Qaeda and the terrorists who carried out the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.
Home Secretary Charles Clarke, who overseas domestic security, did not identify those detained or the precise reasons for their detention in a written statement. But the BBC and other media reported that the group included Abu Qatada, the radical cleric whose taped sermons were found in a Hamburg, Germany, apartment used by several of the Sept. 11 attackers.
"The circumstances of our national security have changed. It is vital that we act against those who threaten it," said Clarke, who oversees domestic security. He was referring to last month's train and bus bombings in London, which killed 56 people and wounded 700 more in the deadliest attack on British soil in a half-century.
Wow. You know, if the stupid American voters start to feel sorry for the democratic whiners, who just can’t get over the fact that they aren’t the dominant force in Congress or the White House, and vote them back into power, then you and I will be a whole lot safer moving to Great Britain.
There is no way a liberal dominated government in the U.S. would ever put their appeasing PC posture aside and actually weed out the terrorists from our country. [Note: a liberal will only become concerned about the terrorist threat when the sword blade is at his or her throat, the family members of victims of terrorist violence are admonished to "take the moral high ground" i.e. the appeasement position]
At least Great Britain recognizes the imperative to maintain their freedom and get rid of the terrorists in their midst!
Officials in the United States and Britain believe Abu Qatada, 44, is an important al Qaeda figure in Europe. He was once described by a British judge as "a truly dangerous individual at the center in the U.K. of terrorist activities associated with al Qaeda."
Qatada, whose real name is Oman Uthman Abu Omar, was arrested on suspicion of terrorism under emergency laws passed by the British government following the Sept. 11 attacks. British officials wanted to deport him to Jordan, but British human rights laws forbid sending people to a country where they might face mistreatment or the death penalty.
What? Human rights for sub-human vermin like Qatada? Please! Qatada and the rest of the Islamo-fascist terrorists surrendered their humanity when they began worshiping a demon god who demands rivers of blood from innocent people. Hacking innocent people’s heads off, and sending "homicide bombers" to massacre hundreds upon hundreds of innocent people is not a characteristic of a creature that deserves human right considerations.
Instead the government used the new anti-terrorism laws to jail Qatada and ten other men indefinitely without charge, leading human rights activists to label Belmarsh Prison, where they were being held, as "Britain's Guantanamo," a reference to the U.S. military detention facility in Cuba.
Last December a panel of British justices ruled that the anti-terrorism policies violated human rights and were discriminatory because they applied to foreigners only. Qatada and seven others were released in March after Qatada had served about 2 1/2 years and others had served more than three years without being charged.
Oh, goodness me. We can’t possibly discriminate against a bloodthirsty terrorist who only wants to murder as many of our citizens as he possibly can to appease his demon god!
The special immigration appeals judge who freed the men ordered them held under "control orders," a form of house arrest under which they were subject to curfews, electronic tagging, regular searches of their homes and a ban on the use of cell phones and computers.
That’s right. Impose curfews, and take away cell phone and computer access and the terrorists among your midst will cave in, change their "naughty ways", and become good little British citizens.
Thursday's detentions come a day after Britain and Jordan reached an agreement that includes assurances from Jordan that those deported would not be mistreated. British officials are also in negotiations to reach similar accords with nine other countries, including Lebanon and Algeria, where others detained today are reportedly citizens.
"If these men can be safely deported now, why has the Home Office claimed for so many years that that was impossible?" said Gareth Peirce, a lawyer who represents several of the men detained Thursday, calling the detentions "insane and dangerous government at its worse."
Peirce issued a statement saying that the men have been "deliberately put out of reach of lawyers who represent them." She said the government was wrong to rely on assurances from Jordan or Algeria that they have changed their practices "overnight" and said "Jordan and Algeria are at the top of every list of countries known to use the most brutal of forbidden measures."
Other than Ms. Peirce and other idiotic cowards like her, who cares whether or not Jordon will play nice with these terrorist thugs. It wouldn’t bother me the teeniest bit if the Jordanian and Algerian governments decided to saw these terrorists heads off to the chants of "Allah Akbar".
Human rights officials expressed concern Thursday.
"The assurances of known torturers -- many of whom deny the use of torture even when it is widely documented -- are not worth the paper they are written on," said Mike Blakemore, a spokesman for Amnesty International in the United Kingdom. "We have seen no indication of any monitoring to ensure that these promises are honored."
Blakemore said Amnesty believes that the British government must prevent more attacks and bring those responsible for last month's attacks to justice. "But going soft on torture is not the answer to terrorism," he said.
Once again, we get to witness the standard liberal lie that they believe we must do everything in our power to prevent any more terrorists attacks, while at the same time, complaining about each and every reasonable attempt to do just that.
Shami Chakrabarti, director of the British human rights group Liberty, said, "What separates us from the terrorists is that we do not torture people or send them to be tortured. It should take more than self-serving assurances to demonstrate that countries with a human rights record such as Jordan's are safe."
No. What separates us from the terrorists is that we don’t condone forcing people to view our screwed up view of religion at sword point. We don’t treat our women like chattle. We don’t make it our policy to murder innocent civilians in cold blood in the name of our demon god. Committing genocide against the people of Israel, and Jews around the world is not one of our goals.
There’s a good reason that Western civilization has advanced while Arabic civilization remains in the 11th century. Western ideas like freedom, respect for the individual and his or her rights, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom to be whatever you desire, study what you want, invent, dream etc. have enabled our civilization to progress.
On the other hand, the barbaric ideas of Wahhabists like Osama Bin Laden and his demonic army, al Qaeda, have ensured that Arabic culture remains one that is depicted as being comprised of picnic blankets wrapped around the heads of men, women so veiled that you can’t tell whether or not they are women, tents, camels, desert heat mixed together with hatred and jealousy.
It’s really ironic that the people who introduced the concept of the number zero have exactly zero contributions toward the advancement of human kind's potential in making the world a better place.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home