The Return of a Leftist Gadfly

The loony left’s “Mother Cindy” has announced that she will return to comfort her flock of misguided, useful idiots. Just for the sheer entertainment value here are her latest whacky comments:

I'm coming back to Crawford for my son. As long as the president, who sent him to die in a senseless war, is in Crawford, that is where I belong. I came here two and a half weeks ago for one reason, to try and see the president and get an answer to a very simple question: What is the noble cause that he says my son died for?

The answer to that question will not bring my son back. But it may stop more meaningless deaths. Because every death is now a meaningless one. And the vast majority of our country knows this. So why do more young men and women have to die? And why do more parents have to lose their children and live the rest of their lives with this unbearable grief?

The presidency is not bigger than the people's will.

And when the people speak out, it's the president's reponsibility to listen. He is there to serve us, not the other way around.

This isn't about politics. It's about what is good for America and what's best for our security and how far this president has taken us away from both


.I'm coming back to Crawford because -- now and forever -- this is my duty for my son, for my other children, for other parents, and for my country.

So, Cindy wants everyone to believe that she is coming back to resume her loony, anti-American, Bush-bashing, whining spectacle in Crawford, Texas “for her son”. Considering the fact that her son re-enlisted in the Army, when he could have came back home and not supported Bush’s “evil war effort”and that he also volunteered to be a part of the resuce mission in which he lost his life, I find that quite frankly hard to believe. Obviously, its doubtful that her son shared her hatred for Bush and her disagreement with the Iraqi war.

No she’s not doing this to carry on her son’s beliefs. She’s there because she is the extreme left’s media whore. Maybe it’s the fame and fortune of the spotlight. Maybe it’s the opportunity to hang out with a bunch of old hippies and listen to Joan Baez perform her tired old 60’s songs in person around the campfire at Camp Casey for free. Who knows?

Saying that she is doing it for her son is disingenous. Based upon his actions, there is nothing to indicate that he would have wanted her to remember him in this way. What she is doing is using her son’s heroic death as a sounding board to project her leftist diatribe.

As for Cindy receiving an answer as to what so noble about the cause her son sacrificed his life for, she has already heard the answer. She just doesn’t like it.

Even if bringing liberty to a nation that was previously under that monster Sadaam Hussein and his torturous, bloody reign, and vastly improving their human rights situation, (a proclaimed concern for liberal groups), doesn’t appeal to her, what about his brave resolve to try and rescue the “children” of other American parents who were pinned down in a fire fight with the terrorists (or as Cindy’s fond of calling them: “freedom fighters”) in Iraq?

Cindy has it all wrong in so many ways. The President is not in office to serve Cindy personally. Her loss doesn’t trump the loss of every other parent in America, (or Britain, Australia, Spain etc. for that matter).

Cindy says: “This isn’t about politics. It's about what is good for America and what's best for our security and how far this president has taken us away from both.”

That’s laughable. Everything coming out of her mouth is political. Her message is all about what extreme leftists, (i.e. Michael Moore, MoveOn.org etc), think is good for this country.

Cindy thinks that it is her duty to her son to be there at Crawford conducting her little anti-American freak show. That’s pretty hard to believe, when she refers to the very terrorists who murdered her son, “freedom fighters”. No. Cindy doesn’t care about her son's memory, much less his heroic honor. She does enjoy the spotlight though.

Betraying her son’s good memory for her “fifteen minutes of fame” is detestable. She ought to be ashamed. But, then there’s a lot she ought to be ashamed of but isn't.