Once Again, Damage Control Brought To You By Hillary

After Bill Clinton had his embarrassing hissy fit during an interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News, his wife has now stepped up to further try and fool the American public into believing that her pathetic husband did every thing he could to take out Osama Bin Ladin and the al Qaeda threat to our country.

Here are some of her quotes found in a story here:

"I think my husband did a great job in demonstrating that Democrats are not going to take these attacks," Hillary Clinton said. "I'm certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled 'Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside the United States' he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team."

Slick Willy would have taken the threat more seriously? Where was his serious response to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing? He never even visited the site after the bombing to show his concern. Also that blow delivered by al Qaeda was at least a good seven years prior to Bush’s eight months into his presidency! Clinton has considerably more than 8 months. He had seven years, and yet did nothing about Osama bin Laden nor al Qaeda! Who does Hillary and the rest of the democrats who tout this charge think they are kidding?!

I heard some further sound bytes on the radio where Hillary accuses Bush, Cheney and Rumsfield of forcing their ideology on the public by pursuing the war in Iraq, a war we are losing and that is “breaking” our military. Breaking our military? Since when are the democrats concerned about the military? She and her husband both never showed any respect, much less concern for the military when Bill was in office.

Hillary’s defense of Bill comes one day after Condeleeza Rice swatted down some of the lies Clinton told Chris Wallace and the American public during his “tough guy, empassioned self defense” schtict.

Here is some of what Rice said in a story found here:

"The notion somehow for eight months the Bush administration sat there and didn't do that is just flatly false - and I think the 9/11 commission understood that."

"What we did in the eight months was at least as aggressive as what the Clinton administration did in the preceding years."

As for Bill Clinton’s claim that he left a “comprehensive anti-terror strategy” for Bush to consult when he came into office, Rice says this:

"We were not left a comprehensive strategy to fight al Qaeda."

Rice responded to Clinton’s pathetic attempt to shift the blame in Bush’s direction thusly:

"I would just suggest that you go back and read the 9/11 commission report on the efforts of the Bush administration in the eight months - things like working to get an armed Predator [drone] that actually turned out to be extraordinarily important."

Whoops! So Bush did do something, beyond lobbing a few missiles at a powdered milk plant.

You know, the last time Bill Clinton wagged his crooked finger at the American public on TV trying to convince us of his innoence, he tried the impassioned role to fool us into believing that he was seriously wronged, and yet in the end reverted to his pathetic: "It depends upon what the definition of is is" to try and weasle out of finally being caught in his lies. I would look for Bill to respond likewise, as more and more of the lies he told during his Fox News interview are revealed. Of course Hillary will soon begin repeating her "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" paranoia as being what is wrong here.

Why Hillary is still willing to clean up her husband's messes is beyond me. Unless, of course, they are just two peas from the same pod of political deceptiveness and self importance over the security of the nation.

Yeah. That must be it.

Nothing else makes sense.

Hillary for '08? Please one Clinton has done more than enough damage to this nation. We don't need a second one!